HSH762 - Resource Allocation and Priority Setting

Unit details

Note: You are seeing the 2020 view of this unit information. These details may no longer be current. [Go to the current version]
Year:

2020 unit information

Important Update:

Classes and seminars in Trimester 2/Semester 2, 2020 will be online. Physical distancing for coronavirus (COVID-19) will affect delivery of other learning experiences in this unit. Please check your unit sites for announcements and updates one week prior to the start of your trimester or semester.

Last updated: 2 June 2020

Enrolment modes:Trimester 2: Burwood (Melbourne), Online
Credit point(s):1
EFTSL value:0.125
Unit Chair:Trimester 2: Anita Lal
Prerequisite:

HSH719

Corequisite:

Nil

Incompatible with:

Nil

Typical study commitment:

Students will on average spend 150 hours over the teaching period undertaking the teaching, learning and assessment activities for this unit.

Scheduled learning activities - campus:

1 x 2 hour seminar each week

Scheduled learning activities - cloud:

1 hour weekly class (recording provided) and 1 hour weekly seminar exercise posted to a moderated online discussion group

Content

This unit introduces students to the challenges of priority setting in health care. Students will gain an understanding of the different approaches used for priority setting and the relevance of context and setting, the role of economic evaluation and issues around involving the public in difficult choices. Alternative methods for priority setting will be explored, including economic (for example league tables, Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis and Assessment of Cost Effectiveness) and non-economic approaches, including the contribution from ethics and theories of social justice.

 

These are the Learning Outcomes (ULO) for this Unit.
At the completion of this Unit, successful students can:

Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes

ULO1

Explain the need for priority setting and the key issues in the context of markets and the role of government in health care.

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO6: Self-management

ULO2

Assess the relative merits of different broad approaches (e.g. ‘implicit’ verses ‘explicit’; different levels of decision-making; ‘technical approaches’ versus ‘due process’; attempts to involve the public in difficult choices).

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO3: Digital literacy
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO5: Problem solving
GLO6: Self-management

ULO3

Appreciate and debate the key features of an ‘ideal’ approach to priority setting, having regard to the contributions from economic theory; from ethics and social justice; from empirical experience; together with the needs of decision-makers.

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO5: Problem solving
GLO6: Self-management
GLO8: Global citizenship

ULO4

Evaluate the role, strengths and weaknesses of non-economic approaches to priority setting, including how conclusions might vary from country to country and between different decision contexts.

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO5: Problem solving
GLO6: Self-management
GLO8: Global citizenship

ULO5

Evaluate the role, strengths and weaknesses of economic approaches to priority setting, including how conclusions might vary from country to country and between different decision contexts.

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO5: Problem solving
GLO6: Self-management
GLO8: Global citizenship

ULO6

Apply priority setting principles to analyse selected case studies drawn from PBMA and ACE studies.

Notes:

PBMA: Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis

ACE: Assessing Cost Effectiveness series

GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities
GLO2: Communication
GLO4: Critical thinking
GLO5: Problem solving
GLO6: Self-management
GLO8: Global citizenship

Assessment

Trimester 2:

Assessment Description

Student output

Grading and weighting
(% total mark for unit)

Indicative due week

Assessment 1: In-trimester exercises (including seminar participation)

Weekly

20%

  • Weekly

Assessment 2: Essay

2,000 words

40%

  • Week 9

Assessment 3: Examination

2 hours

40%

  • Examination period

The assessment due weeks provided may change. The Unit Chair will clarify the exact assessment requirements, including the due date, at the start of the teaching period.

Learning Resource

The texts and reading list for the unit can be found on the University Library via the link below: HSH762 Note: Select the relevant trimester reading list. Please note that a future teaching period's reading list may not be available until a month prior to the start of that teaching period so you may wish to use the relevant trimester's prior year reading list as a guide only.

Unit Fee Information

Click on the fee link below which describes you: